Visit newsguru's column >>

NEWSGURUHome Page

Newsguru - Irresistible News Headlines and Current Events
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 23; Links Seeded: 4984
Member Since: 5/2006Last Seen: 12/22/2009

Lawmakers reach deal on tax rebates

advertisement

Pelosi, D-Calif., agreed to drop increases in food stamp and unemployment benefits during a Wednesday meeting in exchange for gaining rebates of at least $300 for almost everyone earning a paycheck, including low-income earners who make too little to pay income taxes.

Families with children would receive an additional $300 per child, subject to an overall cap of perhaps $1,200, according to a senior House aide who outlined the deal on condition of anonymity in advance of formal adoption of the whole package. Rebates would go to people earning below a certain income cap, likely individuals earning $75,000 or less and couples with incomes of $150,000 or less.

The business tax portion would give businesses incentives to invest in plants and equipment, give small businesses more generous expensing rules, and allow businesses suffering losses now to reclaim taxes previously paid...

 

See more irresistible headlines

• Girl switches blood type, first ever case
• Government computers used to view porn 19,000 times
• South Carolina's largest newspaper endorses Barack Obama
• Charging Your Cell Phone With Your Hand?
• Could Your Dentist Be Drilling for Dollars?
• Earn More Pay Working Fewer Hours
• Usher, Chris Tucker, and more help 'Get Out the S.C. Vote' for Obama
• Starbucks tests $1 cup of coffee and free refills
• Do you think it's okay for voters to use race or gender as consideration when casting their votes?


Way beyond reading. Help write the news. Start a Newsvine column.
Join Newsvine now!

 

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
6.3
{"commentId":1396092,"authorDomain":"newsguru"}

This serves no purpose to a country at a trade deficit. Most of the goods people will buy are foreign made. There is no economy without sufficient jobs and sufficient pay.

Just repeal the tax breaks that are encouraging companies to ship jobs overseas.

{"commentId":1396092,"threadId":"207955","contentId":"1251774","authorDomain":"newsguru"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:26 AM EST
{"commentId":1396122,"authorDomain":"kylen"}

What tax breaks are those? I am only aware of a lower penalty rate that when combined with cheaper labor makes it a better deal for some business but it's not an actual break simply a non-prohibitive high rate - but still higher than 'nominal' with no overseas component.

{"commentId":1396122,"threadId":"207955","contentId":"1251774","authorDomain":"kylen"}
  • 1 vote
#1.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:33 AM EST
{"commentId":1396186,"authorDomain":"newsguru"}

KyleN, my comment simplified the corporate benefits down to "tax breaks". But there are a multitude of benefits to corporations who ship jobs to foreign soil to the detriment of our economy. For one, many companies are allowed to set up "dummy" home office/headquarters in foreign countries to simply avoid paying many taxes. Two, NAFTA. Three, overseas sweatshops. Four, the tax structure overall.

Buffett wants to take the argument further. He says he will bet any Forbes 400 member $1 million (proceeds to charity) that the average federal tax rate (income and payroll) paid by The Forbes 400 is less than the average rate of their secretaries and receptionists. "So far only three close friends, all 400 members, have made the calculation for me," he tells forbes in an e-mail exchange. "They all came up with results similar to mine but have no interest in being identified." -- Source
{"commentId":1396186,"threadId":"207955","contentId":"1251774","authorDomain":"newsguru"}
  • 2 votes
#1.2 - Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:48 AM EST
{"commentId":1396222,"authorDomain":"kylen"}

The Buffett challenge has to do with income taxing which is stupid where we should be using consumption taxing. That would go much further to 'equalizing' real wealth and not playing paper games with income. Investing or placing capital out of jurisdiction increases wealth outside of taxation and that is the reason for his results. Could the same thing apply to consumption? Sure but so what, it's much easier to dump money offshore than it is to try and import goods constantly the breakpoint therefore is higher for the benefit. They can 'cheat' on a super expensive ticket item but are caught by the real estate and 'normal' goods that pile up everyday and in the end are worth far more.

My point is there are a multitude of benefits for companies that don't ship jobs away it just depends on what jobs and what skill level and what ..... lots of variables. We should not restrict trade with tariffs on the mistaken belief it 'keeps' jobs, it simply removes jobs because it's not a zero sum game.

{"commentId":1396222,"threadId":"207955","contentId":"1251774","authorDomain":"kylen"}
  • 1 vote
#1.3 - Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:57 AM EST
{"commentId":1396254,"authorDomain":"newsguru"}
a multitude of benefits for companies that don't ship jobs away

Like what?

{"commentId":1396254,"threadId":"207955","contentId":"1251774","authorDomain":"newsguru"}
  • 1 vote
#1.4 - Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:05 AM EST
{"commentId":1396326,"authorDomain":"kylen"}

To make the lookup easier check out Airbus's grief with Boeing. A hypocritical stance if there ever was one but they do decent job of documenting the breaks given to Boeing to 'stay'. Radioshack has some to be in Fort Worth, Wal-mart has tons of incentives for tons of their locations, the airlines all have great breaks for being where they are, Detroit gets many incentives to keep those around here, the list is nearly endless. This has again to do with how we tax people (one, two, three+ times) depending on so many factors it's crazy.

And a factor not yet mentioned is that the foreign lands have governments too, surprise surprise, and those guys give...tax breaks! So a company considering it's options have many variables going into the decision and the US as a group is not providing some big incentive for off shoring we simply don't penalize it as highly (or as consistently) as some other countries do (those more than most as a number less as a chunk of economic value).

{"commentId":1396326,"threadId":"207955","contentId":"1251774","authorDomain":"kylen"}
  • 1 vote
#1.5 - Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:27 AM EST
Reply
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"207955","isPrivate":false}
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
{"threadId":"207955","contentId":"1251774"}
Start TrackingStart Tracking
Stop TrackingStop Tracking